IT’S ALL BIDEN’S FAULT
- Ventzi Nelson
- May 5
- 4 min read
They are saying it directly: inflation is Biden’s fault, the border is Biden’s fault, crime is Biden’s fault, instability abroad is Biden’s fault. Those statements are being made now, while the federal government is being run by Donald Trump. As of this publication, he has been in office for 470 days. That is the period in which current policy has been set, enforced, and maintained.
During those 470 days, the executive branch has not operated under Biden’s authority. Agency leadership has been replaced. Directives have been issued. Enforcement priorities have been reset. These are not background changes. They determine how the system functions day to day. Immigration enforcement, regulatory oversight, federal prosecution priorities, and foreign policy execution are all carried out under current instructions, not prior ones.
Immigration policy has been altered through those instructions. Detention standards, asylum processing rules, parole authority, and interior enforcement priorities are set by the Department of Homeland Security under current leadership. Those rules define how the border operates. When crossings rise, when processing slows, when releases increase, those outcomes are produced under those rules. They are not generated by a framework that no longer exists.
Economic conditions follow the same structure. Tariffs imposed during this period affect import costs and consumer prices. Regulatory decisions affect operating costs and hiring decisions. Fiscal direction, set in coordination with Congress, affects spending and demand. The Federal Reserve controls interest rates, but the executive branch still shapes a large part of the environment in which businesses and consumers operate. Over 470 days, those inputs accumulate. Prices, wages, and investment reflect the policy mix that exists now.
Crime is largely handled at the state and local level, but federal policy still has measurable influence. The Department of Justice sets prosecution priorities and allocates federal resources. Those priorities affect how federal cases are pursued and how agencies coordinate with local law enforcement. When those priorities change, federal involvement changes with them. That change is part of the current system.
Foreign policy is controlled entirely by the administration in office. Sanctions, diplomatic strategy, military posture, and alliance decisions are executed under current authority. Developments in conflicts, shifts in negotiations, and changes in international positioning reflect those decisions. They are not delayed reactions to prior policy. They are current actions producing current outcomes.
The legislative environment does not prevent action. Republicans control both chambers of Congress under Mike Johnson and John Thune. That control allows legislation to be introduced, advanced, and funded without relying on the opposing party. Internal disagreements may exist, but the structure is unified. If policies are not enacted or funded, that occurs within that unified structure.
The judicial environment also does not block action across the board. The Supreme Court holds a 6–3 conservative majority, including three justices appointed by Trump. Executive actions are reviewed, but they are not consistently prevented at the highest level. Legal limits exist, but they do not eliminate the administration’s ability to implement policy.
These conditions establish capacity. The administration has authority over the executive branch, alignment with Congress, and a judicial environment that does not systematically restrict it. That capacity defines the system in which decisions are made.
Decisions have been made during these 470 days. Immigration rules have been revised. Economic policies have been implemented. Enforcement priorities have been set. Foreign policy strategies have been executed. Each of those decisions produces measurable outcomes. Border statistics, price levels, employment data, enforcement patterns, and international developments all reflect those decisions.
Attribution follows that structure. When a policy is in place and producing results, those results are tied to that policy. When a policy has been replaced, it no longer produces current outcomes. Over 470 days, the governing framework has been shaped by the current administration. The system operating now reflects those choices.
Time narrows the range of attribution. Some policies have long-term effects, such as infrastructure spending or large fiscal programs. Others take effect quickly. Executive orders apply immediately. Enforcement changes affect outcomes within weeks or months. Over this period, both short-term and medium-term effects are visible. A significant portion of current conditions reflects the policies in place during these 470 days.
Decisions are made from available options. Different policy approaches can be taken at each point. When one approach is selected, the outcomes that follow are linked to that selection. If conditions persist after that decision, they exist within the system shaped by it.
The absence of action also produces results. When a problem is identified and tools are available, choosing not to act affects outcomes. Resources are allocated based on priorities. That allocation determines which conditions change and which remain.
There is also a consistency issue within the current explanation. Improvements in economic indicators are attributed to current leadership. That establishes ownership of the system producing those improvements. The same system produces negative outcomes. Attribution cannot shift entirely based on whether results are favorable or unfavorable within the same policy environment.
The claim that “only I can fix it” concentrates responsibility. It places authority and expectation in the same position. When that claim is made and the office is held, outcomes are evaluated against it. If conditions persist, they persist within a system controlled by the person making that claim.
The current explanation separates control from responsibility. Control exists in the present. Responsibility is assigned to the past. That separation becomes less stable as time passes and policy changes accumulate.
The system that governs immigration, economic conditions, federal enforcement, and foreign policy is operating under current authority. Policies are being set within that system. Decisions are being implemented through it. Outcomes are being produced by it.
470 days is not a transitional period. It is a period in which control has been exercised and results have followed.
Promises Made Promises Kept